Skip to content
TIMOTHEOS
  • Log-In
  • TOPICS MENU
  • LGV
  • FORUMS
    • Create Account
  • YOUTUBE
  • 4WINDS
  • Search Icon
The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses

The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses

September 30, 2026 Timothy Comments 4 comments

As I have been translating Matthew 11 for the LGV, I was forced by the Greek grammar of verse 14 to an entirely new conclusion about the two witnesses in Revelation 11. The question concerns whether or not John the Baptist completely fulfills the prophecy of Malachi concerning Elijah. Let’s consider Malachi’s prophecy applied to John the Baptist and Malachi’s prophecy about Elijah.

Malachi 3:1 (NKJV) 1 “Behold, I send My messenger, And he will prepare the way before Me. And the Lord, whom you seek, Will suddenly come to His temple, Even the Messenger of the covenant, In whom you delight. Behold, He is coming,” Says the LORD of hosts.

Malachi 4:4-6 (NKJV) “4 Remember the Law of Moses, My servant, which I commanded him in Horeb for all Israel, with the statutes and judgments. 5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD. 6 And he will turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, And the hearts of the children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the earth with a curse.”

Looking at these two prophecies from a purely Jewish mindset, they appear to be both speaking of the same coming of the Messiah, and that “My messenger” in Mal. 3:1 is then identified as “Elijah the prophet” in Mal. 4:4-6. That is, the Messiah suddenly coming “to His Temple” in Mal. 3:1 is a reference to the “Day of LORD” in Mal. 4:5. This is why the Jews are looking for Elijah to come just before their Messiah appears.

The first prophecy in Mal. 3:1 is clearly identified with John the Baptist in the Gospels (Matt. 11:10; Mark 1:2; Luke 7:27). But how do the Gospels handle the second prophecy in Mal. 4:5-6? This prophecy is also said to be fulfilled in John the Baptist. Consider what Gabriel said to Zecharias, the father of John the Baptist, about John’s role in fulfillment of Malachi.

Luke 1:17 (LGV) 17 “And he [John] will go before in His sight, in the breath and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children and the disobedient to the disposition of the just, to make ready a people having been prepared for the Master.”

Jesus also interpreted Mal. 4:6 (turning the hearts of the fathers to the children) in reference to John the Baptist.

Mark 9:11-13 (LGV) 11 And they were inquiring of Him saying that, “The Pharisees and Scribes say that Elijah is required to come first.” 12 So He was explaining to them, “Indeed, Elijah, having come first, restores everything [Mal. 4:5-6]. And how has it been written about the Son of Man that He should suffer much and be scorned? 13 But I tell you that Elijah has come (and they did to him whatever they were willing), just as it has been written concerning him.”

Jesus said that not only had “Elijah” come already, but He also said that “Elijah, having come first, restores everything,” thus fulfilling Malachi 4:6, “he will turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, And the hearts of the children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the earth with a curse.” Did John the Baptist restore everything? Hardly.

The problem concerning John the Baptist and Elijah has created radical divisions among Christians concerning eschatology, whether the Millennial Kingdom arrived at Jesus’ first coming (Amillennialism) or arrives at His second coming (Premillennialism). If John the Baptist fulfilled all of Malachi 4:5-6, then the Kingdom should have immediately followed. But if Elijah has a future role to play before the second coming, then Malachi 4:5-6 was only partially fulfilled by John, or it is a prophecy with two completely different meanings!

As to whether “Elijah” still has a role to play in the future just before the second coming, that issue was decisively resolved by Jesus in Matthew’s account which is parallel to Mark 9:11-13 quoted above.

Matthew 17:10-11 (NKJV) “And His disciples asked Him, saying, ‘Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?’ Jesus answered and said to them, ‘Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things‘.” Note that Jesus used the future tense verb, yet He said this after John the Baptist had been beheaded. Therefore, when Jesus spoke these things, there was both a past coming of “Elijah” and a future coming of “Elijah,” both in fulfillment of Malachi’s prophecies.

According to Gabriel, John the Baptist would be “Elijah,” not literally, but in the sense that the same “spirit” and “power” of God that was upon Elijah would be upon John the Baptist. (Remember that Elisha also asked for a double portion of Elijah’s spirit when Elijah was about to be taken up in the fiery chariot, and he indeed received it, demonstrating a precedent for this language – 2 Kings 2:9-10). Consequently, according to Gabriel, John would indeed fulfill Malachi 4:5-6. This would seem to support the Amillennial interpretation of the Kingdom. Yet, while John certainly could be said to have come in the “spirit” of Elijah, the same could not really be said of his coming in the “power” of Elijah, the one who called fire down from heaven upon his enemies, who parted the Jordan river, and who commanded a drought for 3.5 years. John’s Gospel makes a point of the fact that John the Baptist performed no miracles at all (John 10:41). Also, how could John fulfill Mal. 4:6 concerning turning the hearts of the people back to God, which Jesus interpreted as “restore everything” (Mark 9:12)? While he did bring repentance to a few, he certainly did not completely fulfill what Malachi 4 says that “Elijah” would do just before the Day of the LORD when God strikes the land and consumes the wicked (Mal. 4:1-3).

The solution to this puzzle is found in Matthew’s account. Consider Jesus’ statement about John the Baptist in Matthew 11.

Matt. 11:7-14 (LGV) 7 So with these leaving, Jesus began to say to the crowds concerning John, “What did you go out into the wilderness to see, a reed being shaken by wind? 8 But what did you go out to see, a man having been dressed in effeminite [clothing]? Look, those wearing effeminite [clothing] are in king’s houses. 9 But what did you go out to see, a prophet? Yes, I tell you, and much more than a prophet. 10 This is the one about whom it has been written, ‘Look, I send My messenger before Your face who will prepare Your way before You.’ [Mal. 3:1] 11 Truly I tell you, among those born of women none has been raised up greater then John the Immerser. Yet the least in the Kingdom of the skies is greater than he. 12 Yet from the days of John the Immerser until now the Kingdom of the skies is violently seized, and the violent snatch it [away]. 13 For all the prophets and the Law prophesied until John. 14 And if you are willing to accept [this], he is ‘Elijah,’ the one who is to come.” The personal pronoun “he” refers to John. That is, John is the one who is yet to come. While Malachi says that God will send “Elijah the prophet” before the Day of the LORD, “Elijah” is a surname given to John because of the spirit and power of Elijah placed upon him. Therefore, the original prophet Elijah is not coming in the end times as one of the two prophets, John the Baptist is coming again in the spirit and power of Elijah. The two end-time prophets are John the Baptist (the last prophet of the Old Testament) and John the Apostle (the last prophet of the New Testament).

Some English translations wrongly translate verse 14 as: “And if you care to accept it, he himself is Elijah, who was to come“ (KJV, NASB), thus giving cover to the Amillennial interpretation and leaving no future role for John. But the Greek reads: αὐτός ἐστιν Ἠλίας ὁ μέλλων ἔρχεσθαι, literally, “he is Elijah, the impending coming one.” The NASB and KJV wrongly translate the present participle μέλλων (which means “impending”) as past, “who was to come” instead of how it is actually written, “who is yet to come.” The Greek word μέλλων which I translated as “impending” always refers to expectation of a future occurrence. John not only came already as “Elijah” (Mark 9:13), but he is coming again as “Elijah”! The personal pronoun “he” refers to John, not to Elijah. He will be one of the two witnesses, coming in the spirit and power of Elijah. This time he will display the power that Elijah displayed, in calling down fire from heaven and withholding rain (Rev. 11:3-6). So while the Jews are expecting the historical Elijah to show up soon, what they will actually get is John the Baptist.


Last-Days Overcomers, Lost in Translation, Prophecy & Current Events

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
Confusion Concerning the Atonement
NEXT
The Ten Commandments & the New Testament

4 thoughts on “The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses”

  1. JamesM says:
    October 16, 2026 at 6:21 am

    Hi Tim,
    That “Elijah” is John the Baptist according to Matthew 11:14 is something to consider. I can see how that would be hard to accept as 11:15 indicates. This does, however, raises several questions.
    1. Why in Matthew 17 would “Elijah” appear with Jesus in a vision of the coming Kingdom when John will be the prophet?
    2. Did he just look like Elijah to his disciples? In fact Jesus said, “Mat 17:10 – And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come? 17:11 – And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.
    3. In 11:14 is “Elijah” the predicate nominative” referring to the subject? That would further support your assertion?
    4. In the book called “Malachi” why would not God call “Elijah” “my messenger” or name him “John”?
    5. Do you believe the time referred to in Malachi when “Elijah” is on the scene and the time when John the Baptist came are parallel events whether or not both prophets are Elijah? If they are parallel, even though the temple was not being built in John’s day, is it possible that “Elijah” would again strengthen the law by beginning to proclaim the New Covenant as John the Baptist did, since the law “was weak through the flesh” and because of “the weakness and unprofitable mess of it”?

    James

    Log in to Reply
    1. Timothy says:
      October 16, 2026 at 9:19 am

      James,

      1. The Transfiguration event was not a conjuring up of the ghosts of Moses and Elijah as is typically assumed. It was a VISION of the KINGDOM, with Moses, Elijah, and Jesus all seen as having been resurrected to immortality, in “GLORY” (Luke 9:32; 2 Pet. 1:16-17). In the resurrection, we also will be seen with Jesus in “GLORY” (Col. 3:4). According to Matthew 17:9, this was a “VISION,” and the vision was of the “the Son of Man coming in His Kingdom“ (Matt. 16:28). Likewise Peter interpreted this event as “the power and COMING (parousia) of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty” (2 Pet. 1:16).
      2. I don’t think so. The disciples did not know what Elijah looked like.
      3. v. 14 αὐτός ἐστιν Ἠλίας “he (John) is Elijah.” “Elijah” is the predicate and “he” is the subject, and the antecedent to the personal pronoun “he” is John in v. 13. But keep in mind that in context Jesus was specifically referring to “Elijah” of Malachi 4:5. That is, Jesus was explaining who “Elijah” is in that prophecy, not necessarily linking John with the historical Elijah. And as I showed in the article, Scripture has precedent for the “spirit/breath” of the historical Elijah being passed on to another, Elisha. Gabriel announced to John’s father Zacharias that John would come in “the spirit/breath of Elijah” (Luke 1:17) and he quoted Mal. 4:6 and applied it to John. This prophecy is specifically about “Elijah” coming just before “the great and awesome Day of the LORD.” The only way to harmonize all of these Scriptures is to understand that Mal. 4:5-6 uses the name “Elijah” metaphorically because the same “spirit/breath” and “power” that was upon the historical Elijah will be upon John the Baptist just before the Day of the LORD. This cannot refer to John’s first coming because John performed no miracles and because it immediately precedes the Day of the LORD.
      4. Malachi’s two prophecies of John the Baptist in Mal. 3:1 and Mal. 4:5-6 follow the same kind of “mystery” language throughout the Old Testament which also refers to the coming of Christ, such as Psalm 22 and Isa. 53. This is why Paul declared: “according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began” (Rom. 16:25). See also 1 Cor. 2:7. Calling John “Elijah” in Mal. 4 was intended to conceal the fulfillment of this prophecy. The Jews expected that the historical Elijah would be resurrected and reappear before the Messiah. Yet John was known to be the son of Zecharias and Elizabeth thus he could not be the resurrected historical Elijah, and the pious Jews did not believe in reincarnation like the Greeks.
      5. John the Baptist did not strengthen the Law of Moses as Mal. 4:4-6 indicates when he preceded Jesus. John did not preach the Law of Moses. He preached the “the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins” and the coming of Jesus as Mal. 3:1 indicates. Mal. 4:4-6 is only fulfilled just before the Day of the LORD. The repentance in the Law of Moses concerned returning to all of the commandments in the Law (Deut. 30:1-6). John did not preach this, but he will just before the Day of the LORD.
      Again, THE KEY to this entire “mystery” is in recognizing that the prophecy of Mal. 4:4-6 uses the name “Elijah” as a mystical name for John, not literally of the historical Elijah. It is drawing a parallel, not making an actual identification. The Old Testament prophets “conceal” the mystery from Israel while Jesus and the Apostles “reveal” the mystery through the Spirit (Rom. 16:25-26; 1 Cor. 2:7-10).

      Log in to Reply
      1. JamesM says:
        October 16, 2026 at 11:53 pm

        Tim,
        1. “The Transfiguration event was not a conjuring up of the ghosts of Moses and Elijah as is typically assumed” I agree. This is clearly a vision of resurrected saints in the kingdom.

        2. “I don’t think so. The disciples did not know what Elijah looked like.” Can we be sure since Peter wanted to make a booth for Elijah and for Moses and Jesus as well? Perhaps Peter and the others being “heavy with sleep” misidentified them. Moreover, I always assumed that the coming of Elijah before the great day of the LORD was confirmed by the vision of Elijah in the kingdom in Matthew and Luke, having been resurrected after being killed by the Antichrist.

        3. It’s interesting that John performs no miracles and the person can still be John in a later parallel event performing miracles like Elijah (and no rain) and plaguing people/nature like Moses. Yet a Rabbi on a video says that the Messiah does no miracles in the coming kingdom. Therefore he can’t be Jesus since Jesus performed miracles.

        5. “John the Baptist did not strengthen the Law of Moses as Mal. 4:4-6 indicates when he preceded Jesus.” Can Mal 4:4 possibly refer to the inter-testamental period? I was wondering if John the Baptist proclaiming the gospel afterward in Lk3:1-18, Jn 1:15-37, 3:22-30 and in other places was the way in which the law would be strengthened – (Dan 9) by obeying the New Covenant by faith – since the law was weak through the flesh for those who thought they could be justified by it -especially since “Lk 1:16 says – And many of the children of Israel shall he turn to the Lord their God. 1:17 – And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the HEARTS of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord and strengthened later a second time before Christ returns Mal 4:6 – “And he shall turn the HEART of the fathers to the children, and the HEART of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.”

        Log in to Reply
  2. JamesM says:
    October 17, 2026 at 8:22 am

    Tim,
    3. Please disregard this “Yet a Rabbi on a video says that the Messiah does no miracles in the coming kingdom. Therefore he can’t be Jesus since Jesus performed miracles.” That is not correct.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.




Gifts/Donations are NOT tax deductible

tim@4windsfellowships.net

Recent Topics

  • Announcements (8)
  • Apostolic Monotheism (67)
    • Unity & the Christian Fundamentals (8)
  • Being a Timothy (6)
  • Deception in the Last-Days (35)
  • Last-Days Overcomers (16)
    • The Ten Commandments (2)
  • Lost in Translation (17)
    • The Casting-Down of the World (4)
  • Pristine Eschatology – Chiliasm (12)
  • Prophecy & Current Events (18)
  • The Feasts of the LORD (7)
  • The Time of the End (29)

Recent Posts

  • Bereans Bible Institute — Hebrews October 16, 2026
  • The Ten Commandments & the New Testament October 7, 2026
  • The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses September 30, 2026
  • Confusion Concerning the Atonement August 28, 2026
  • Modern Trinitarians do not hold to the Nicene Creed August 19, 2026
  • The “Worship Experience” & Idolatry August 4, 2026

Recent Comments

  • JamesM on The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses
  • JamesM on The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses
  • Timothy on The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses
  • JamesM on The 2 “Johns” as the 2 Witnesses
  • JamesM on Confusion Concerning the Atonement
  • Karl Kozlowski on Confusion Concerning the Atonement

"... [A]ttend to reading, to entreating, and to teaching. Do not neglect the gift which was given to you ..."

1 Tim. 4:13-14
© 2026   Copyright Tim Warner; 4Winds Fellowships. All Rights Reserved.