TIMOTHEOS

The video below is an attempt by Dr. William Lane Craig to explain and justify the modern Evangelical interpretation of the Trinity. My comments are below. The problem with Dr. Craig’s argument is threefold: 1. Scripture calling Jesus “God” does not establish a divine nature nor His being 1/3 of a tri-personal being. The same words (Heb. -Elohim, Grk. – Theos) are commonly used of pagan gods, human rulers, antichrist, and even Satan (the god…

Read More Read More

Trinitarians often claim that Jesus raised Himself from the dead by His own power based on two passages which are both badly misinterpreted, John 2:19-22 and John 10:17-18. These are given as proof both for the doctrine of “hypostatic union” (that Jesus was fully divine and fully human simultaneously) and that the dead are conscious and active. The first problem with this claim is that there are a host of Scriptures which flatly contradict it,…

Read More Read More

From my several years-long interactions with so-called “Biblical Unitarians” I have come to conclude that their self-named doctrine is a pseudonym, a false title. The accurate title should be “Philosophical Unitarianism.” A careful and objective analysis of their handling of Scripture reveals that their denial of Christ’s “preexistence” is based entirely on a faulty philosophical foundation rather than on a biblical foundation. Once their philosophical axioms are assumed, the Scriptures which at face value teach…

Read More Read More

Throughout most of the book of Acts, Christianity was considered a denomination or “sect” within Judaism (called the “Nazarenes”1), the other Jewish sects being the Pharisees,2 the Sadducees,3 and the Essenes.4 Membership of Gentiles was allowed in the synagogues, but always in a secondary status and only by making a commitment to observe the Law of Moses and undergoing circumcision. In the new Nazarene (Jewish-Christian) Faith, many assumed that the same was required of Gentile…

Read More Read More

The distinction which divided Apostolic Christianity from all forms of Gnosticism was “preexistence” of Jesus, whether the divine Person of Logos (Word) actually “became flesh,” (a total transformation of ontological nature), that the Son of God literally “emptied Himself” of His equality with God by “becoming in the likeness of men,” “being made like unto His brethren.” All forms of Gnosticism denied that the Man Jesus preexisted and denied the possibility of a divine being…

Read More Read More

Philippians 2:5-8 provides a critical proof that Jesus literally preexisted as God’s divine Son before He “became in the likeness of men.” This passage, plus Colossians 1:15-20, and several from John are absolutely decisive as long as the interpreter sticks to the norms of lexical meanings of the Greek terms and the norms of the Greek grammar and syntax. Unfortunately, both modern Trinitarians and Unitarians fudge in this regard in order to prop up their…

Read More Read More

Hebrews 1:1-2 is used by ‘Biblical’ Unitarians as proof that the Son of God did not exist before the prophets. Yet they seriously misrepresent what the text actually indicates. They ignore the many similar statements in both the Old and New Testaments which limit this statement to God’s using the prophets to warn rebellious Israel (the “fathers” after the exodus), and they seem oblivious to the parallel with Jesus’ parable of the Vineyard owner who…

Read More Read More

Richard from the “Faithful Theology” YouTube channel asked me to participate in a live discussion with himself and a Biblical Unitarian, Aaron. The intent was to answer a few questions from those who deny the pre-human existence of Christ. The conversation got off to a rocky start due to technical difficulties, and Richard could not directly participate. Because of this, the 5 main questions I had agreed to answer were not really presented. However, Aaron…

Read More Read More

So-called ‘Biblical’ Unitarians claim that the Son of God only existed, before becoming flesh, only in the MIND of God as a figment of His imagination, in His “plan.” To support this claim, they typically begin with 1 Peter 1:20 which states that He was “foreknown” before the “foundation of the world” but was “manifested” in these times. They then appeal to the Calvinistic interpretation of “foreknown” (pro-ginosko), as having knowledge of someone before they…

Read More Read More

According to the KJV, NKJV, and the Catholic Douay Rheims Bible, Nebuchadnezzar claimed that the fourth Man in the fiery furnace was “like the Son of God.” However, the vast majority of modern versions have “like a son of the gods.” This difference is because the KJV, NKJV do not slavishly follow the Hebrew Masoretic Text, but sometimes revert to readings in the Greek Septuagint especially in Christologically significant passages. On the other hand, most…

Read More Read More

Biblical Unitarians validate their unbelief regarding the Son’s pre-human existence primarily on an argument from silence. They claim that the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) say absolutely nothing about preexistence. They then attempt to filter all of the preexistence language in John’s Gospel through a fabricated “Jewish” philosophical paradigm so that none of it is taken literally. However, they miss one of the most important conversations Jesus had with the Jewish scholars concerning Psalm 110:1…

Read More Read More

In the past I have taught that the “Root” of the “Olive Tree” in the parable in Romans 11 is the Abrahamic Covenant. I was wrong. It is the “Seed” promised in the Abrahamic Covenant, who is Christ according to Galatians 3:16. This is God’s Son who was betrothed to Israel first under the Mosaic Covenant, but then again under the New Covenant. Here is my reasoning: Romans 11:16-29 (NKJV) 16 For if the FIRSTFRUIT…

Read More Read More

We are beginning section “D” of Bereans Bible Institute Module II on the doctrine of God and His Only-Begotten Son. This section will deal primarily with the “proof-texting” done by Biblical Unitarians (Socinians) and their specific arguments in their attempt to prove that Jesus had no pre-human existence, and that He was not LITERALLY the “Son of God,” not LITERALLY “begotten” out of God, fathered by God Himself. In this first installment, I tackle the…

Read More Read More