Skip to content
TIMOTHEOS
  • Log-In
  • TOPICS MENU
  • FORUMS
    • Create Account
  • LGV
    • Jerusalem Assembly
      • Matthew’s Gospel
      • 1 Acts (1-12)
      • James
      • Jude
    • Peter’s Ministry
      • Mark’s Gospel
      • 1 Peter
      • 2 Peter
    • Paul’s Ministry
      • Luke’s Gospel
      • 2 Acts (13-28)
      • Galatians
      • 1 Thessalonians
      • 2 Thessalonians
      • 1 Corinthians
      • 2 Corinthians
      • Romans
      • Ephesians
      • Colossians
      • Philemon
      • Philippians
      • Hebrews
      • Titus
      • 1 Timothy
      • 2 Timothy
    • John’s Ministry
      • John’s Gospel
      • 1 John
      • 2 John
      • 3 John
      • Revelation
  • YOUTUBE
  • 4WINDS
  • Search Icon
BBI II-D #1 The “Genesis” of Jesus Christ (Matt. 1:18 & Luke 1:35)

BBI II-D #1 The “Genesis” of Jesus Christ (Matt. 1:18 & Luke 1:35)

July 20, 2024 Timothy Comments 0 Comment

We are beginning section “D” of Bereans Bible Institute Module II on the doctrine of God and His Only-Begotten Son. This section will deal primarily with the “proof-texting” done by Biblical Unitarians (Socinians) and their specific arguments in their attempt to prove that Jesus had no pre-human existence, and that He was not LITERALLY the “Son of God,” not LITERALLY “begotten” out of God, fathered by God Himself.

In this first installment, I tackle the two primary “proof-texts” that Biblical Unitarians lean on in the Synoptic Gospels. The first is Matthew 1:18 which they claim proves that the Son’s “genesis/origin” was at His conception in Mary. Therefore, His conscious Person could not have existed previously. The second proof-text is Luke 1:35 where Gabriel announces to Mary that she will be the mother of Jesus. This verse is used to prove that the expression “Son of God” does not mean that God literally “fathered” Jesus, but instead that He was only CALLED the “Son of God,” and that His sonship was by adoption not by procreation.

In Matt. 1:18 Biblical Unitarians make a severe contextual error by going beyond what the text actually says, thus drawing an unwarranted conclusion. In Luke 1:35 they rely on incorrect Trinitarian translations. They ignore the nuances of the Greek grammar which prove that Jesus was already “begotten” before Mary became pregnant, and Gabriel said that it was for THIS REASON He would be called “Son of God.”

BBI_2D_01Download

Apostolic Monotheism

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
BBI II-C #6 The Divorce and Remarriage of the LAMB
NEXT
Christ the “Root” of the “Olive Tree”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.




Gifts/Donations are NOT tax deductible

tim@4windsfellowships.net

Recent Posts

  • Dedicated LGV Website August 24, 2025
  • LGV Luke August 1, 2025
  • King Jesus & His Coming Kingdom July 11, 2025
  • The 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse June 22, 2025
  • The Coming END of “Mystery Babylon” May 7, 2025
  • Today is the most Solemn Day of the Year April 18, 2025

Recent Comments

  • Raymond on LGV Luke
  • Karl Kozlowski on Dedicated LGV Website
  • Timothy on Dedicated LGV Website
  • Pramod on Dedicated LGV Website
  • Renier van Rooyen on Dedicated LGV Website
  • Timothy on LGV Luke

Recent Topics

  • Announcements (5)
  • Apostolic Monotheism (64)
    • Unity & the Christian Fundamentals (8)
  • Being a Timothy (6)
  • Deception in the Last-Days (17)
  • Last-Days Overcomers (9)
  • Lost in Translation (15)
    • The Casting-Down of the World (4)
  • Pristine Eschatology – Chiliasm (11)
  • The Feasts of the LORD (4)
  • The Time of the End (19)

"... [A]ttend to reading, to entreating, and to teaching. Do not neglect the gift which was given to you ..."

1 Tim. 4:13-14
© 2025   Copyright Tim Warner; 4Winds Fellowships. All Rights Reserved.