Theological Christian Perspective to the War in Israel
Since 1947-48, when the modern state of Israel was established by the United Nations, there has been a continuous stream of conflict and violence against Israel by its neighbors. The Six-Day War in 1967 is considered by both Jews and Christians as divine intervention. Against enormous odds, Israel deflected the simultaneous attacks from the surrounding nations, defeated them decisively in six days, and recaptured Jerusalem and especially the Temple Mount which had been denied her by the UN mandates. Many have compared that seemingly supernatural feat with certain biblical events where God fought for Israel against incredible odds. Yet, having gained this great victory, and even acknowledging God’s own apparent intervention, the modern state of Israel immediately caved to pressure from the UN and gave up territory gained including the Temple Mount in order to secure a “peace” settlement that relied on the UN for security instead of Yahweh.
Perhaps it is merely coincidence (or just my imagination). But I see a parallel here with the events leading up to the Babylonian exile. Twenty years before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem he came to Jerusalem and forced Jehoiakim king of Judah to submit to him and become his vassal.[1] Immediately following this, God sent bands of raiders from the surrounding nations to harass Judah constantly.[2] At the end of twenty years, God gave Judah a golden opportunity to repent and avoid Jerusalem’s destruction and the impending seventy-year Babylonian exile prophesied by Jeremiah.[3] This opportunity was by entering into a covenant with God to allow all of their slaves to go free[4] since they had failed to do this for many years as the Sabbatical-year commandment required.[5] At first the people agreed, entered into a solemn covenant with God, releasing their slaves as the Law of Moses and Jeremiah’s prophecy required. But almost immediately they changed their minds, broke their covenant, and put their slaves back into bondage. Having spurned this last opportunity to avoid the desolation of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount, Nebuchadnezzar’s armies destroyed Jerusalem, demolished the Temple, and took the Jews captive for seventy years. At the end of those seventy years, God sent His “anointed,” Cyrus, king of Persia, to set Israel free to rebuild Jerusalem and the House of God.[6]
There were twenty years between Judah becoming a vassal kingdom in serving the king of Babylon and the last chance God gave them to have liberty and avoid the prophesied seventy-year exile. Likewise, there were twenty years between Israel’s serving the United Nations as a vassal kingdom, and God’s supernatural intervention in the Six-Day War, gaining back all of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount.
Following their ancient failure, Jerusalem was destroyed and the Jews served Babylon for seventy years before God finally delivered them through His “anointed” Cyrus in the 70th year. In modern times, the state of Israel has served the whims of the United Nations ever since 1967, repeatedly giving up more and more land for empty promises of peace, only to be attacked and harassed continually. If this apparent parallel is indeed by design, Israel’s slavery to the UN will be abolished by the “Anointed” King of Israel, Jesus Christ. The Jewish – biblical year from Rosh Hashanah 2036 through Rosh Hashanah 2037 will be the 70th year counting from the Six Day War.
The title of this blog post is “THEOLOGICAL CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE TO THE WAR IN ISRAEL?” Christianity is divided on how to relate to Israel into two main camps that are both extreme in my opinion. On the one hand, Protestant denominations which tend to be “amillennial” in their eschatology claim that God was finished with Israel when they rejected Christ, and all of the promises to Israel in the Old Testament are to be figuratively applied to “the Church” and its alleged heavenly destiny. This is called “Replacement Theology” and has roots all the way back to the time of Augustine. These Christians tend to support the Palestinians and view the modern state of Israel as oppressor of downtrodden peoples. They think they are reflecting true Christianity by supporting the supposed victims of Israel’s occupation. There is also an undercurrent of antisemitism among many of these Christians.
The other extreme comes from those who hold a “dispensationalist” viewpoint, claiming that Israel is God’s “earthly people” while the church is God’s “heavenly people.” These see the Abrahamic Covenant, especially the permanent Land inheritance, as unconditional for Israel. This means that Israel has a divine right to all of the land God promised to Abraham. In this view, Christians have an obligation to support the modern state of Israel when it comes to their right to the Holy Land. They often quote God’s statement to Abraham in Gen. 12:3 to justify complete support of Israel, “I will bless those who bless you, And I will curse him who curses you.”
Neither of these extreme views are biblical. The amillennial view denies the literal fulfillment of God’s promises to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and many of His promises to the nation of Israel in the prophets, ultimately making God a liar. Yet the dispensational view ignores the New Testament teaching regarding Christians having an inheritance also along with Israel in the Kingdom, and the requirement of Israel’s national repentance in order to realize the Abrahamic permanent inheritance of the Land. Dispensationalists unconditionally support Israel’s right to the land now while remaining in rebellion against God, something that the Bible absolutely opposes. The cursings found in the Law of Moses require exile for Israel, persecution by her enemies, and God’s House in Jerusalem remaining desolate for the specified time. The Babylonian exile was marked by the desolation of the Temple for seventy years. The Roman exile, which began in AD 70, has also been marked by the desolation of the Temple Mount. Jesus predicted the Roman exile in Luke 21 and that it will end “when the times of the gentiles are fulfilled.” Until then, the nation of Israel remains under the curse of the Law and will continue to be until they are prepared to acknowledge Jesus Christ and say, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the LORD!”[7]
It was God who sent the surrounding nations to harass Judah when they became a vassal state for Nebuchadnezzar.[8] It was God who sent Nebuchadnezzar to destroy His own House in Jerusalem and take Judah captive for those seventy years.[9] It is the same God of Abraham who sent the Roman armies to destroy Jerusalem and His House the second time.[10] God continues to use Israel’s enemies for her discipline until she returns to Him. Very soon the “ten kings” of Rev. 17 will arise from the old Roman Empire and the Two Witnesses will begin to prophesy in Jerusalem for 1,260 days. The recent events in Israel and Europe are no doubt setting the stage. Everything is progressing according to God’s plan.
Christians should always be supportive of the oppressed, regardless of whether it is individual Palestinians who are used as pawns by their own leaders, or the Jewish people who are being murdered by their enemies. We should be compassionate towards Israelis and Palestinians, demonstrating God’s love for all people who will repent. But it is not our business to be involved in the political situation, or to publicly resist whatever God is doing in bringing this situation to its prophesied conclusion. It will not end well for those who resist God, either in His blessing or in His harsh discipline.
[1] Dan. 1:1-2
[2] 2 Kings 24:1
[3] Jer. 25:11-12; Jer. 29:10
[4] Jer. 34
[5] Deut. 15:12
[6] Isa. 44-45; Dan. 9
[7] Matt. 23:39
[8] 2 Kings 24:1-4
[9] Jer. 21:7; Jer. 22:25
[10] Matt. 22:1-7
13 thoughts on “Theological Christian Perspective to the War in Israel”
Hi Tim,
Thank you for your thoughts. Somone posted this on Twitter:
“Yes, modern Israel IS the return of biblical Israel!
The Jewish people were SUPPOSED to return to the land in disobedience. Only after that would the Spirit work on them, leading to a generation of faith (Ezekiel 36:22-38).”
Is this reasoning flawed?
Brian
Brian,
Yes, that reasoning is seriously flawed and dangerous. Israel has been in exile since AD 70, and this exile will continue until a certain condition is met: “And they will fall by the edge of the sword and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled” (Lk. 21:24 NKJ). The Law of Moses requires that national repentance must precede God’s fulfilling His promise to return Israel to the Land for the inheritance and promise of the Abrahamic Covenant.
Deut. 30:1 “Now it shall come to pass, when all these things come upon you, the blessing and the curse which I have set before you, and you call them to mind among all the nations where the LORD your God drives you, 2 and you return to the LORD your God and obey His voice, according to all that I command you today, you and your children, with all your heart and with all your soul, 3 that the LORD your God will bring you back from captivity, and have compassion on you, and gather you again from all the nations where the LORD your God has scattered you. 4 If any of you are driven out to the farthest parts under heaven, from there the LORD your God will gather you, and from there He will bring you. 5 Then the LORD your God will bring you to the land which your fathers possessed, and you shall possess it. He will prosper you and multiply you more than your fathers. 6 And the LORD your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your descendants, to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, that you may live.”
Note that national repentance must come first, then God will fulfill His promise to end their exile and restore them to the Land in fulfillment of the Abrahamic Covenant. This statement in the Law is THE BASIS for all of the promises in the prophets that God would restore Israel back to the Land BY HIS OWN POWER. These promises are consistently accompanied by the promise of peace and prosperity, and never being harassed again. For example, in Ezek. 36 which you mentioned, we have this: 30 “And I will multiply the fruit of your trees and the increase of your fields, so that you need never again bear the reproach of famine among the nations.”
This “return” is also accompanied by the resurrection of the righteous dead as indicated in the very next chapter.
Ezek. 37:12 “Therefore prophesy and say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord GOD: “Behold, O My people, I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. 13 Then you shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O My people, and brought you up from your graves. 14 I will put My Spirit in you, and you shall live, and I will place you in your own land. Then you shall know that I, the LORD, have spoken it.”
Israel does NOT “return” to the Land in fulfillment of the covenants and promises until God does it by His miraculous power. The UN is not the “arm of the Lord.” Because of bad theology, dispensationalists throw their full support behind the modern state of Israel, its political agenda, and its claims of sole ownership of the Land based on the Abrahamic Covenant while remaining in unbelief regarding the Messiah, and without the national repentance required by the Law in Deut. 30. The 2nd exile that began in AD70 was because of Israel’s hypocrisy in keeping the Law of Moses and thus rejecting the Messiah when He came. Why would the exile end while Israel remains dug in with the same rebellion? When dispensationalists fully support Israel’s claims on the Land they are essentially telling the Jewish people that they do not need national repentance according to Deut. 30 and they do not need Christ. Yet Paul said that they have been “cut off” from the root and the Abrahamic Covenant.
The UN’s dividing the Land is not God’s doing (even though it serves to set the stage for Israel’s most severe judgement). Here is what God says about it: Joel 3:2 “I will also gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat; And I will enter into judgment with them there on account of My people, My heritage Israel, Whom they have scattered among the nations; They have also divided up My land.”
When God steps in to fulfill His covenants and promises it will be absolutely unmistakable that Yahweh is doing it, just as with the 10 plagues in Egypt. This is how Yahweh is “glorified among the nations.” This divine intervention will begin with the 1260-day prophesying of the two Witnesses and the resumption of Temple worship under their watch and protection (Rev. 11). This is when the national repentance (of the 144k, 12k from each tribe) will occur as described in Deut. 30 through the return to the Law of Moses first which requires the Temple and priesthood. This is also why Dan. 9:27 states that “the covenant” (Mosaic) will be “strengthened” or “renewed” for one “week” (7 years) giving Israel this last limited window of opportunity to do exactly what Deut. 30 says they must do: “… you return to the LORD your God and obey His voice, according to all that I command you today, you and your children, with all your heart and with all your soul …” (Deut. 30:2 NKJ). This can only be done by the restoration of the priesthood and a Temple. The first half of the 70th “week” will allow for protected worship and national repentance, and the second half of the “week” will be Israel’s time of “testing” for the genuineness of their repentance. This is also why the Hebrew OT ends with this statement:
Mal. 4:4 “Remember the Law of Moses, My servant, Which I commanded him in Horeb for all Israel, With the statutes and judgments. 5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet Before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD. 6 And he will turn The hearts of the fathers to the children, And the hearts of the children to their fathers, Lest I come and strike the earth with a curse.”
Dispensationalist Christians’ full support for the state of Israel and the Jewish claim on the Land by divine right NOWis largely responsible for the continued suffering of the Jewish people. This unconditional support has not, and will not, be effective in bringing them to repentance and eventually to Christ. In addition, it makes (dispensationalist) Christianity the enemy of the Palestinian people, driving them more and more towards radical Islam. The dispensationalist message essentially tells Israel that (a) they do not need national repentance, and (b) they do not need Christ (some dispensationalists even go so far as to claim that Israelis can be saved without acknowledging Christ). This horrific theology and its misguided pseudo-support for the Jewish people is setting up the majority to accept the pseudo-peace that will be offered by the Antichrist. This is the horrific effect of dispensationalist theology. It was the British “Christian Zionist” movement driven largely by dispensationalists (followers of John Darby) who applied the political pressure which drove the Balfour Declaration (1917) and eventually led to the UN mandates to divide up the Holy Land and give Israel a homeland in 1947-48. No doubt the motives were honorable. But in the end the big-picture effects are a lot of death and destruction of both Palestinians and Israelis. No doubt all of these things were and are part of God’s permissive will and are necessary to set the stage for the end-time drama. But there is a radical difference between Christians being an active player and agent in what God is doing to redeem and restore Israel vs. being an active player in setting the stage for His severe judgement against them. The Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar and the Romans under Titus were also carrying out God’s plan when they slaughtered the Jewish people and destroyed Jerusalem. But just because they were pawns in God’s implementing His severe judgement against Israel does not mean they are off the hook for their part in the slaughter. Dispensationalists have cast their lot in with, and have been cheering on, the modern Jewish “Zealots.” The resulting carnage will be worse than the uprising of the ancient “Zealots” in AD 66-70.
Tim,
A have a question based on below cuts from what you said:
Tim> ”Israel has been in exile since AD 70, and this exile will continue until a certain condition is met: “And they will fall by the edge of the sword and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled” (Lk. 21:24 NKJ). The Law of Moses requires that national repentance must precede God’s fulfilling His promise to return Israel to the Land for the inheritance and promise of the Abrahamic Covenant…
This “return” is also accompanied by the resurrection of the righteous dead as indicated in the very next chapter…
These promises are consistently accompanied by the promise of peace and prosperity, and never being harassed again…”
Anders: These events are in the equation:
1. The 2nd exile (diaspora) ends (and the Jews are regathered in the Land).
2. The times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
3. National repentance.
4. Resurrection.
5. Peace and prosperity.
It seems to me that you are saying that all 5 are fulfilled at the return of Christ. My view has been that only 4-5 are fulfilled at the return, while 1-3 are fulfilled at the start of the tribulation (where the ”national repentance” is through the Old covenant offerings).
Please, comment on this.
/Anders
Anders,
Maybe I was not as clear as I should have been.
1. Both the Babylonian and Roman “diasporas” are marked by the “desolation” of Jerusalem, which is the vacancy of God’s House on the Temple Mount. This vacancy is THE sign that God’s presence is not among His people Israel. This vacancy will end when the two witnesses begin their testimony and the worship of Yahweh resumes according to Rev. 11.
2. Jerusalem being trodden down by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled (mentioned in Luke 21) refers to the period between AD 70 and the beginning of the 1260 days of the 2 witnesses. However, during the last half of the 70th week, when the Man of Sin brings a halt to the “daily sacrifice” and places the “abomination of desolation,” Jerusalem will again be “tread underfoot by the Gentiles” for forty-two months (Rev. 11:2) the duration of the Beast’s reign (Rev. 13:5). It is also possible that the “times of the Gentiles” in Lk. 21 covers from AD 70 until the second coming, and that the testimony of the 2 witnesses is within this period. In that case, Rev. 11:2 would indicate that only 42 MORE months will transpire of Jerusalem’s being trampled by the Gentiles.
3. The national repentance will occur throughout the 1260 days of the 2 witnesses, and the testing and preservation from the plagues will continue through the 42 months of the Antichrist’s reign.
4. The resurrection will occur at Christ’s return at the end of the 42 months and will include both Jew and Gentile. Immediately after this, Zech. 12:10-14 will be fulfilled, which is a second national repentance of living Jews. The first national repentance concerns ONLY Israel’s failure to keep the Law of Moses. The second repentance (for the same group) occurs 3.5 years later and is for their rejection of Christ, whom Moses said was coming but they rejected (Deut. 18:15-19; Jn. 5:46). Both of these must occur before God fully restores repentant Israel to the Land, bringing them from many countries (Isa. 49:22-25; Isa. 60:9).
5. Peace and prosperity for Israel is the description of the Kingdom. But this “return” of Israel will not be in “immortality” but in mortality. However, the resurrected of Israel will be of the same “bride” as Gentile Christians, given immortality.
Great!
We are in total agreement.
/Anders
Who is being referenced in this verse from Isaiah 66:18-21? Point 5 from above seems to indicate that their will be a portion of Israel at the return of Christ that inherits immortality but that there are remaining Jews who will participate in the Kingdom’s peace and prosperity but as mortals. Am I understanding correctly and does the verse below apply to this topic? I’ve always had a hard time interpreting this verse.
18 “For I know their works and their thoughts. It shall be that I will gather all nations and tongues; and they shall come and see My glory. 19 I will set a sign among them; and those among them who escape I will send to the nations: to Tarshish and Pul and Lud, who draw the bow, and Tubal and Javan, to the coastlands afar off who have not heard My fame nor seen My glory. And they shall declare My glory among the Gentiles. 20 Then they shall bring all your brethren for an offering to the Lord out of all nations, on horses and in chariots and in litters, on mules and on camels, to My holy mountain Jerusalem,” says the Lord, “as the children of Israel bring an offering in a clean vessel into the house of the Lord. 21 And I will also take some of them for priests and Levites,” says the Lord.
Adam,
There is a portion of Israel that inherits immortality, all those raised in the first resurrection, and those living Jews who have accepted the Gospel prior to the 2nd coming. So there is indeed two classes of Israelites in Isaiah 66.
Tim,
Thanks for helping me understand. I’m guessing that Isaiah 65:17-25 is also addressing this mortal class of Jews who live during the millennium. Am I right about that?
Yes, verses 20 & 23 make it clear that it is speaking of mortals.
20 “No more shall an infant from there live but a few days, Nor an old man who has not fulfilled his days; For the child shall die one hundred years old, But the sinner being one hundred years old shall be accursed. … 23 They shall not labor in vain, Nor bring forth children for trouble; For they shall be the descendants of the blessed of the LORD, And their offspring with them.”
Great article! This has got my wheels turning on the question of the land inheritance. Since the land inheritance to Abraham is to the seed, which is Christ and all baptized into Him (Jew and Gentile), is there an any unique promises for the Jewish believer related to the resurrection and immortal state that differs from the gentile believer? I’m thinking specifically of the land allotments in Ezekiel 47-48 which are appointed by tribe after the resurrection appear to give a unique promise of proximity to Jerusalem for the Jew. Also, the promise of Abraham to make of him a great nation (singular) seems to have a unique application to Israelites in the age to come. Does Paul’s answer to “what advantage then does the Jew have? “ only apply in the mortal state but gives no advantage in the resurrection? I’m trying to get my mind around what distinctions are promised by God to Jews verse Gentiles in the next age (if any). Thanks for your thought and help
Jamie,
That is a great question. To my knowledge, the Bible does not address the question of the specific land allotments regarding Gentile ethnic groups. However, consider the following passage which seems to indicate that some Gentiles will indeed dwell in the Holy Land:
Isaiah 54:1-3 (NKJV) “Sing, O barren, You who have not borne! Break forth into singing, and cry aloud, You who have not labored with child! For more are the children of the desolate Than the children of the married woman,” says the LORD. 2 “Enlarge the place of your tent, And let them stretch out the curtains of your dwellings; Do not spare; Lengthen your cords, And strengthen your stakes. 3 For you shall expand to the right and to the left, And your descendants will inherit the nations, And make the desolate cities inhabited.
Also certain Gentiles will also be priests in the Temple in Jerusalem according to Rev. 3:12. Yet the whole earth is the inheritance of the Son according to Psalm 2, which will be shared with believers (Rev. 2:26-27). In Rev. 5:9-10 & Rev. 7:9 (& Rev. 20:4) there are redeemed from every nation ruling with Christ, no doubt over the various nations from which they came. So my inclination is that we will inhabit and inherit lands in which we live or are from, speaking those languages.
Tim,
Do you have any comments on who is currently dwelling in the region known as “Israel “? It seems that, since very few (if any) know which tribe they are from, and most who call themselves “Jews” are of mixed ethnicity, their claim is in doubt. There’s a lot of noise on the web regarding their “true” ethnicity. Any thoughts?
Doug,
The only thing I can say on that subject is this: The modern state of Israel considers an “Israeli” (for citizen purposes) as any person who has an Israeli mother. But the Bible reckons an Israelite as one who has an Israelite father. Because of this, there are many “Israeli” citizens who are not “Israelites” by the Biblical standard, and there are many “Israelites” who are not recognized by the state of Israel as “Israelis.” I am sure there is a lot of overlap, and many (if not most) “Israelis” are “Israelites” by the biblical standard. But I have no way of identifying them, and I do not think it is productive to categorize any group using exclusive language. I do know that God knows, and the fact that He identifies 144,000 from the twelve tribes in Rev. 7 proves that He is keeping track.