Skip to content
TIMOTHEOS
  • TOPICS
  • EMAIL LIST
  • FORUMS
    • Register
    • User Login
    • General Topics
    • God, His Son, & His Spirit
    • Eschatology
    • Exegesis of Specific Passages
    • Private Forum
  • LGV
    • Jerusalem Assembly
      • Matthew’s Gospel
      • 1 Acts (1-12)
      • James
      • Jude
    • Peter’s Ministry
      • Mark’s Gospel
      • 1 Peter
      • 2 Peter
    • Paul’s Ministry
      • Luke’s Gospel
      • 2 Acts (13-28)
      • Galatians
      • 1 Thessalonians
      • 2 Thessalonians
      • 1 Corinthians
      • 2 Corinthians
      • Romans
      • Ephesians
      • Colossians
      • Philemon
      • Philippians
      • Hebrews
      • Titus
      • 1 Timothy
      • 2 Timothy
    • John’s Ministry
      • John’s Gospel
      • 1 John
      • 2 John
      • 3 John
      • Revelation
  • BBI
    • 1. Reasons to Believe
    • 2. Doctrine of God
    • 3. Doctrine of Man
    • 4. Destiny of Man
    • 5. Redemption of Creation
    • 6. Life of Christ
    • 7. Apostolic Mission
    • 8. Christian Assembly
    • 9. Christian Home
    • 10. Hebrews
    • 11. Revelation
    • 12. Faithful Shepherds
  • YOUTUBE
  • 4WINDS FELLOWSHIPS
  • Search Icon
BBI II:4 The “Word” identifies God’s Subordinate Agent in Gen. 1

BBI II:4 The “Word” identifies God’s Subordinate Agent in Gen. 1

March 15, 2023 Timothy Comments 0 Comment

John’s prologue was intended to reveal what is rather vague in the Genesis creation account. In this lesson we dissect the Greek grammar of the four clauses contained in John 1:1-2 and answer the question: “Who or what is the ‘Word’ (Logos) in John’s prologue?” Is it the name of a Person as in Trinitarianism? Is it the “words” (commands) “Let there be …” in Genesis 1? Is it an abstract “Plan” in God’s mind? The grammatical errors made by both Trinitarians and Socinian Unitarians are also explained in detail in this lesson:
1. Trinitarians force co-equality & co-eternality into John’s prologue
2. Arians create two independent “Gods”
3. Socinian (Biblical) Unitarians make the personal noun “God” an abstract concept.

If you have any comments or questions, please go to the YouTube channel and post them under the video there.


Apostolic Monotheism

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1?
NEXT
BBI II:5 Logos’ Origin as the first “Life”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *






Gifts/Donations are NOT tax deductible

Email:
tim@4windsfellowships.net

Recent Posts

  • BBI II:5 Logos’ Origin as the first “Life” March 29, 2023
  • BBI II:4 The “Word” identifies God’s Subordinate Agent in Gen. 1 March 15, 2023
  • BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1? March 4, 2023
  • BBI II:2 Most Christians don’t know what the word “God” means. March 4, 2023
  • BBI II:1 Objectivity in the Pursuit of Pristine Monotheism March 4, 2023
  • 1 John 1:1 “That which…” or “The One who…”? February 5, 2023

Recent Comments

  • James Munoz on BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1?
  • James Munoz on BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1?
  • Timothy on BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1?
  • Steve Smith on BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1?
  • Timothy on BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1?
  • Timothy on BBI II:3 To Whom was God speaking in Genesis 1?

Recent Topics

  • Apostolic Monotheism (31)
    • Unity & the Christian Fundamentals (8)
  • Being a Timothy (6)
  • Deception in the Last-Days (5)
  • Lost in Translation (13)
    • The Casting-Down of the World (4)
  • Pristine Eschatology – Chiliasm (8)
  • The Time of the End (9)

"... [A]ttend to reading, to entreating, and to teaching. Do not neglect the gift which was given to you ..."

1 Tim. 4:13-14
© 2023   Copyright Tim Warner; 4Winds Fellowships. All Rights Reserved.